Price v. Jackson

3 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 26, 1843 N.Y. LEXIS 378
CourtNew York Court of Chancery
DecidedMay 2, 1843
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 26 (Price v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Price v. Jackson, 3 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 26, 1843 N.Y. LEXIS 378 (N.Y. 1843).

Opinion

Decided that one copartner cannot transfer to another person anY greater interest in a debt due to the copartnership and which is not negotiable, than he has himself; that is, so much of such debt as belongs to him in equity after payment of the partnership debts and the adjustment of the rights of the copartners between themselves. And that where the as-signee has notice that it is a copartnership debt in which he ⅛ purchasing the interest of one copartner, that is sufficient [27]*27to put him upon inquiry as to the rights of the other copart-ner, and it is his duty to apply to him and ascertain his equitable rights.

Order appealed from affirmed with costs, to be paid by appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 26, 1843 N.Y. LEXIS 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/price-v-jackson-nychanct-1843.