Price v. Hurley

51 A. 339, 201 Pa. 606, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 895
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 24, 1902·No. Appeal, No. 293·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Pee Ctjexam,

No reasons were given by the court below for dismissing the bill but it is manifest that the bill is multifarious and that so far as it sets out a cause of action it is one cognizable at law.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Price v. Hurley, 51 A. 339, 201 Pa. 606, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 895 (Pa. 1902).

51 A. 339 (Price v. Hurley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fleming v. Strayer
80 A.2d 786 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1951)
Hanna v. Chester Times
166 A. 243 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
Seeds v. Franklin
16 Pa. D. & C. 489 (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, 1931)