Price v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedMay 31, 2011
DocketCivil Action No. 2011-1002
StatusPublished

This text of Price v. Federal Bureau of Investigation (Price v. Federal Bureau of Investigation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Price v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, (D.D.C. 2011).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FILED MAY 3 1 20n Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Mary A. Price, ) Courts for the District of Columbia ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11 1002 ) Federal Bureau of Investigation, ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of the pro se complaint and

application to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"). The Court will grant the IFP application and

dismiss the case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the Court is required to dismiss a complaint

upon a determination that it, among other grounds, is frivolous. 28 U.S.c. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).

Plaintiff, a resident of Baton Rouge, Louisiana, sues the FBI for negligence. Plaintiff

alleges that she "lost prematurely a sibling kidney transplant in Florida" and "almost died."

Compl. at 1. She faults the FBI for, among other alleged misdeeds, having "failed to inform her

that she had abnormal blood and urine tests indicating a possible organ rejection." Compl. at 1.

Most of the allegations concern plaintiff's medical care and have nothing to do with the FBI.

Those allegations that implicate the FBI are predicated on plaintiff's mistaken belief that the FBI

breached some sort of duty owed her.

A complaint may be dismissed under 28 U.S.c. § 1915(e)(2) as frivolous when it

describes fantastic or delusional scenarios, contains "fanciful factual allegation[s]," Neitzke v.

Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989), or lacks "an arguable basis in law and fact." Brandon v.

I ( " District of Columbia Ed. of Parole, 734 F.2d 56, 59 (D.C. Cir. 1984). This complaint qualifies

for such treatment. A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

r v[~ s: )j~ United States District Judge Date: May ~~ ,2011

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Neitzke v. Williams
490 U.S. 319 (Supreme Court, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Price v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/price-v-federal-bureau-of-investigation-dcd-2011.