Price v. Delaney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Price v. Delaney

81 A.D.2d 837, 438 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11503

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 4, 1981

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 81 A.D.2d 837 (Price v. Delaney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Price v. Delaney, 81 A.D.2d 837, 438 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11503 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent, dated October 5, 1979, which, after a hearing, found petitioner guilty of certain misconduct and suspended him without pay for a period of one month. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The determination that petitioner exhibited certain confidential documents to unauthorized persons is supported by substantial evidence. Furthermore, the penalty imposed was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). Damiani, J. P., Lazer, Gibbons and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent, dated October 5, 1979, which, after a hearing, found petitioner guilty of certain misconduct and suspended him without pay for a period of one month. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The determination that petitioner exhibited certain confidential documents to unauthorized persons is supported by substantial evidence. Furthermore, the penalty imposed was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). Damiani, J. P., Lazer, Gibbons and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 A.D.2d 837, 438 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/price-v-delaney-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack