Price v. Davis Coal & Coke Co.

57 A. 769, 208 Pa. 395, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 773
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 7, 1904
DocketAppeal, No. 228
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 57 A. 769 (Price v. Davis Coal & Coke Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Price v. Davis Coal & Coke Co., 57 A. 769, 208 Pa. 395, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 773 (Pa. 1904).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from the discharge of a rule to show cause why the suit should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction, the alleged want of jurisdiction being based on an affidavit and plea that the same cause of action had been pleaded by plaintiff as a set-off in another suit between the parties which is still pending. This is not good even as a plea of lis pendens, in abatement: Stroh v. Uhrich, 1 W. & S. 57; Gilmore v. Reed, 76 Pa. 462. The discharge of the rule was in no view a final judgment from which an appeal would lie.

Appeal quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCowin v. Montgomery
44 Pa. D. & C.2d 787 (Mercer County Court of Common Pleas, 1968)
Frank P. Miller Paper Co. v. Keystone Coal & Coke Co.
118 A. 565 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 A. 769, 208 Pa. 395, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/price-v-davis-coal-coke-co-pa-1904.