Price v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, S.D. Ohio·Decided October 31, 2024·No. 2:24-cv-01099·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Shiloh P., ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-CV-01099 Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Chief Judge Morrison Martin O’Malley, ) Chief Magistrate Judge Litkovitz Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) )

ORDER

This cause coming before the Court on the joint motion of the parties, due notice having been given, and the Court being fully advised, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The Parties’ Joint Stipulation for an Award of Attorney’s Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act is accepted and Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees in the amount of $4,200.00 and costs in the amount of $00.00, for a total award of $4,200.00;

2. Counsel for the parties shall verify whether or not Plaintiff owes any preexisting debt subject to offset, consistent with Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 560 U.S. 586 (2010) and 31 U.S.C. §§ 3701(b), 3711, 3716. If no such pre-existing debt exists, Defendant shall pay the EAJA fees award directly to Plaintiff’s counsel pursuant to the EAJA assignment signed by Plaintiff; and

3. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Sarah D. Morrison SARAH D. MORRISON CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Price v. Commissioner of Social Security, (S.D. Ohio 2024).

Price v. Commissioner of Social Security (Price v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)