Price v. Coleman

22 F. 694, 1885 U.S. App. LEXIS 1831

This text of 22 F. 694 (Price v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Price v. Coleman, 22 F. 694, 1885 U.S. App. LEXIS 1831 (circtdma 1885).

Opinion

Colt, J.

We approve of the clerk’s taxation of costs. The taxation is not contrary to equity rule 62, because the defendant filed his separate demurrer, and appeared by separate counsel. We also think the hearing on demurrer a final hearing within the meaning of section 824, Eev. St., and that therefore a docket fee of $20 was properly taxable. A demurrer raises an issue which, when tried, will finally dispose of the case, unless leave to amend or plead over is granted. There can be no other trial, except at the discretion of the court, and if final judgment is entered on the demurrer it will be a final determination of the rights of the parties, which can be pleaded in bar to any other suit for the same cause of action. This is the view expressed by the supreme court in Alley v. Nott, 111 U. S. 472, 475; S. C. 4 Sup. Ct. Rep. 495.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alley v. Nott
111 U.S. 472 (Supreme Court, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 F. 694, 1885 U.S. App. LEXIS 1831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/price-v-coleman-circtdma-1885.