Price v. City of Dayton
This text of 820 F.2d 405 (Price v. City of Dayton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Ronald K. PRICE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF DAYTON; Tyree Broomfield; Robert Reynolds; Mark
J. Varvel; Frank W. Navarre; Robert Chabali;
Donald Shows; Thomas Shaw; Jerome
Czisma; Steven Holland,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 86-3593.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
June 9, 1987.
Before KENNEDY, WELLFORD and MILBURN, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not necessary. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).
For the reasons stated in the district court's decision and entry of May 30, 1986, its final judgment entered that same date is affirmed. See Thomas v. Shipka, --- F.2d ----, No. 86-3230 (6th Cir., May 1, 1987). Rule 9(b)(4), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
820 F.2d 405, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 7411, 1987 WL 37608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/price-v-city-of-dayton-ca6-1987.