Price v. Buckler
This text of 6 Ky. Op. 582 (Price v. Buckler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[583]*583Opinion by
The demurrer was properly sustained to appellant’s answer. There is no allegation whatever showing the mistake was committed, whether by an omission to include items or in some other way.
The answer is that there was a mistake in the settlement to the plaintiff’s prejudice of one hundred and fifty dollars. This is no defense whatever. The facts showing the mistake must be specifically set forth. Gains & Clark v. Parks & Erskind, 3 B. Monroe 223.
The judgment is affirmed.
-, for appellant.
-, for appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Ky. Op. 582, 1873 Ky. LEXIS 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/price-v-buckler-kyctapp-1873.