Price v. Bloomfield Township

Michigan Court of Appeals

Price v. Bloomfield Township

255 Mich. App. 801

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 6, 2003

DocketDocket No. 220285

StatusPublished

This text of 255 Mich. App. 801 (Price v. Bloomfield Township) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Price v. Bloomfield Township, 255 Mich. App. 801 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

This matter is again before us pursuant to a remand order from the Supreme Court 467 Mich 917 (2002). As directed by that order we vacate the Worker’s Compensation Appellate Commission’s decision and remand the case to that body for it to apply the legal principles outlined in our decision, Price v Bloomfield Twp, 244 Mich App 410; 625 NW2d 790 (2001), and to make such findings of fact necessary, if any, to a proper disposition. Mudel v Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co, 462 Mich 691; 614 NW2d 607 (2000). We do not retain jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This matter is again before us pursuant to a remand order from the Supreme Court 467 Mich 917 (2002). As directed by that order we vacate the Worker’s Compensation Appellate Commission’s decision and remand the case to that body for it to apply the legal principles outlined in our decision, Price v Bloomfield Twp, 244 Mich App 410; 625 NW2d 790 (2001), and to make such findings of fact necessary, if any, to a proper disposition. Mudel v Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co, 462 Mich 691; 614 NW2d 607 (2000). We do not retain jurisdiction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 Mich. App. 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/price-v-bloomfield-township-michctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack