Price Mercantile Co. v. Sutton

164 S.E. 95, 45 Ga. App. 191, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 219
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 29, 1932
Docket22030
StatusPublished

This text of 164 S.E. 95 (Price Mercantile Co. v. Sutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Price Mercantile Co. v. Sutton, 164 S.E. 95, 45 Ga. App. 191, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 219 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Luke, J.

Though the evidence in this action for damages for malicious prosecution is conflicting in important particulars, there seems to be some evidence to support the verdict; so the general grounds of tb motion for a new trial can not be sustained; and, inasmuch as ' harmful error appears from any of the special grounds of the mot11’ the discretion exercised by the trial judge in denying that motion''’111 not be disturbed. "

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., eoneurs. Bloodworfh, J., abnt on account of illness. J. L. Wimberly, R. W. West, W. M. West, for plaintiff in error. Grady Gillon, Eallie B. Bell, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 S.E. 95, 45 Ga. App. 191, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/price-mercantile-co-v-sutton-gactapp-1932.