Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Price-Evans Foundry Co. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Price-Evans Foundry Co. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.

91 S.E. 283, 19 Ga. App. 264, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 90
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 1, 1917
Docket8241
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 91 S.E. 283 (Price-Evans Foundry Co. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Price-Evans Foundry Co. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co., 91 S.E. 283, 19 Ga. App. 264, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 90 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

1. A tliird person dealing with an agent of an undisclosed principal can not hold the principal liable under the contract, where the principal has previously accounted and settled with the agent. Civil Code (1910), § 3596. **“"*300

2. Under the agreed statement of facts, section 3601 of the Civil Code, cited by counsel for the plaintiff in error, is not applicable.

3. The court did not err in directing a verdict for the defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Fund for Public Service, Inc. v. Associated Textiles, Inc.
245 N.W. 376 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1932)
Beacham v. Coe-Mortimer Co.
118 S.E. 441 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 S.E. 283, 19 Ga. App. 264, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/price-evans-foundry-co-v-southern-bell-telephone-telegraph-co-gactapp-1917.