Prezzato v. Linington

Michigan Court of Appeals

Prezzato v. Linington

166 N.W.2d 601, 15 Mich. App. 523, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1509

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 28, 1969

DocketDocket No. 4,407

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 166 N.W.2d 601 (Prezzato v. Linington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Prezzato v. Linington, 166 N.W.2d 601, 15 Mich. App. 523, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1509 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This civil action was brought by plaintiffs, Prezzato, against appellee, Linington, for damages resulting from the alleged negligent operation of defendant’s motor vehicle.

Following a jury trial, a unanimous verdict of no cause of action was rendered. Subsequently a motion for judgment notwithstanding verdict or for new trial was heard and denied. Plaintiffs appeal.

An examination of the record and briefs discloses evidence sufficient to support the verdict. There is no showing of an abuse of discretion by the trial court in denying plaintiffs’ motion for new trial [524]*524which, would constitute reversible error, Oppenheim v. Rattner (1967) 6 Mich App 554.

Affirmed.

Fitzgerald, P. J., and R. B. Burns and Bronson, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI