Preziosi v. Kantor

283 A.D.2d 474, 724 N.Y.S.2d 885, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5013

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Eitan Kantor and Shari Kantor Berkowitz appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Galasso, J.), dated January 10, 2001, as granted the plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment against them on the issue of liability.

[475]*475Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment against the appellants on the issue of liability (see, Campanella v Moore, 266 AD2d 423; Schmidt v Edelman, 263 AD2d 502; Sass v Ambu Trans, 238 AD2d 570; Young v City of New York, 113 AD2d 833). Santucci, J. P., S. Miller, Luciano, Feuerstein and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Preziosi v. Kantor, 283 A.D.2d 474, 724 N.Y.S.2d 885, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5013 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

283 A.D.2d 474 (Preziosi v. Kantor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Young v. City of New York
113 A.D.2d 833 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Sass v. Ambu Trans, Inc.
238 A.D.2d 570 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Schmidt v. Edelman
263 A.D.2d 502 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Campanella v. Moore
266 A.D.2d 423 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)