Preziosi v. Kantor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Preziosi v. Kantor

283 A.D.2d 474, 724 N.Y.S.2d 885, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5013

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 14, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D.2d 474 (Preziosi v. Kantor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Preziosi v. Kantor, 283 A.D.2d 474, 724 N.Y.S.2d 885, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5013 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Eitan Kantor and Shari Kantor Berkowitz appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Galasso, J.), dated January 10, 2001, as granted the plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment against them on the issue of liability.

[475]*475Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment against the appellants on the issue of liability (see, Campanella v Moore, 266 AD2d 423; Schmidt v Edelman, 263 AD2d 502; Sass v Ambu Trans, 238 AD2d 570; Young v City of New York, 113 AD2d 833). Santucci, J. P., S. Miller, Luciano, Feuerstein and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Eitan Kantor and Shari Kantor Berkowitz appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Galasso, J.), dated January 10, 2001, as granted the plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment against them on the issue of liability.

[475]*475Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment against the appellants on the issue of liability (see, Campanella v Moore, 266 AD2d 423; Schmidt v Edelman, 263 AD2d 502; Sass v Ambu Trans, 238 AD2d 570; Young v City of New York, 113 AD2d 833). Santucci, J. P., S. Miller, Luciano, Feuerstein and Adams, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D.2d 474, 724 N.Y.S.2d 885, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/preziosi-v-kantor-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack