Prewitt v. Principal Health Care

752 So. 2d 96, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1926, 2000 WL 220431
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 28, 2000·No. No. 1D99-1391·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation case, we affirm the denial of benefits based upon the finding that claimant’s work was not the major contributing cause of her bilateral carpel tunnel syndrome. However, we reverse the denial of benefits based upon the finding that claimant’s work did not produce a disabling aggravation of a preexisting, asymptomatic, condition, and remand for further consideration in light of our decision in J & J Enterprises v. Oweis, 733 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). We note that the judge of compensation claims did not have the benefit of that opinion when called upon to decide this matter.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED, with directions.

KAHN, WEBSTER and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prewitt v. Principal Health Care, 752 So. 2d 96, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1926, 2000 WL 220431 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

752 So. 2d 96 (Prewitt v. Principal Health Care) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tice v. ALBERTSON'S
940 So. 2d 1253 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
City of Cooper City v. Farthing
905 So. 2d 925 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)