Prewitt v. Neal
This text of 1 Minor 386 (Prewitt v. Neal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court,
This was an action of Trespass, vi et armis, by Prewiti against Neal, for entering his close and taking his goods,
On the trial the plaintiff offered to prove that when the tregpass was committed the defendant was Sheriff of Madison County; and that the trespass complained of was com[387]*387mitted by one of his deputies. This evidence, on the objection of the defendant, was rejected.
The law is clear that the high Sheriff is answerable for the official acts of his deputy, and that this is the proper action against him for a trespass committed by his deputy under colour of office. 1 Doug. 43. 3 Wilson, 309.
We are of opinion that the Circuit Court erred in. rejecting the testimony. Let the judgment be reversed, and the cause be remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Minor 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prewitt-v-neal-ala-1825.