Prewitt v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.

36 S.W. 667, 134 Mo. 615, 1896 Mo. LEXIS 221
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedJune 15, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 36 S.W. 667 (Prewitt v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prewitt v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co., 36 S.W. 667, 134 Mo. 615, 1896 Mo. LEXIS 221 (Mo. 1896).

Opinion

Bubgess, J.

This is the second appeal by defendant in this case. The first judgment was in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $8,500; the one from which the present appeal was taken is for the sum of $6,000. When the case was here on the first appeal it was heard in the second division; the judgment reversed and the cause remanded, because of errors committed by the trial court in giving and refusing instructions. 115 Mo. 283.

The suit is prosecuted to recover damages for personal injuries, sustained by plaintiff, by being run over by the cars of defendant in the negligent violation of an ordinance of the city of Moberly limiting the rate [620]*620of speed of ears and locomotives propelled by steam to not exceeding six miles per hour. No objection was made to the petition. The defenses were a denial of the alleged negligence, and charges of contributory negligence.

There was no material difference in the facts disclosed at the last trial from the first, which are very fully stated by G-antt, J., in the opinion then delivered, and which it is unnecessary to restate. The plat referred to by the witness Ferris is as follows:

[621]*621

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Neely v. Kansas City Public Service Co.
252 S.W.2d 88 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1952)
Blancke v. New York Central Railroad
103 Ohio St. (N.S.) 178 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1921)
Decker v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
172 S.W. 1168 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1915)
Peperkorn v. St. Louis Transfer Railway Co.
154 S.W. 836 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1913)
Torreyson v. United Railways Co.
152 S.W. 32 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1912)
Torreyson v. United Railways Co.
145 S.W. 106 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1912)
Nashville, Chattanooga & Saint Louis Railway v. Peavler
68 S.E. 432 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)
Stotler ex rel. Stotler v. Chicago & Alton Railway Co.
98 S.W. 509 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1906)
Sluder v. St. Louis Transit Co.
88 S.W. 648 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1905)
Hutchinson v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
61 S.W. 852 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1901)
Jackson v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad
58 S.W. 32 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1900)
Dunn v. Northeast Electric Railway Co.
81 Mo. App. 42 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 S.W. 667, 134 Mo. 615, 1896 Mo. LEXIS 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prewitt-v-missouri-kansas-texas-railway-co-mo-1896.