Prevost v. Gorrele
This text of 19 F. Cas. 1297 (Prevost v. Gorrele) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The language of the statute is plain: “All writs of execution” are to run and be executed all over the state, where it consists of more than one district “May” means at the plaintiff’s option. He has a right to concurrent execution all over the state. It is impossible to give the words of the statute effect unless every writ is allowed to run in all the districts in the same state. The formal direction to one marshal is of no consequence, since the same act of eongress which enlarges the territorial power of the writ enlarges the direction correspondingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 F. Cas. 1297, 12 West. Jur. 372, 10 Chi. Leg. News 229, 25 Pitts L.J. 125, 13 Phila. 468, 1877 U.S. App. LEXIS 1969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prevost-v-gorrele-circtedpa-1877.