Preterm-Cleveland, Inc. v. Kasich

Ohio Supreme Court

Preterm-Cleveland, Inc. v. Kasich

2017 Ohio 664, 70 N.E.3d 599, 148 Ohio St. 3d 1415

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 24, 2017

Docket2016-1252

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 Ohio 664 (Preterm-Cleveland, Inc. v. Kasich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Preterm-Cleveland, Inc. v. Kasich, 2017 Ohio 664, 70 N.E.3d 599, 148 Ohio St. 3d 1415 (Ohio 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 103103, 2016-Ohio-4859. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County.

Upon review of the notice of automatic exclusion filed in this case by the Office of Attorney Services, it is evident that Jennifer Lee has not complied with the pro hae vice registration requirements as outlined in Gov.Bar R. XII. Therefore, it is ordered by the court that the pro hac vice admission of Jennifer Lee is revoked.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 103103, 2016-Ohio-4859. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County.

Upon review of the notice of automatic exclusion filed in this case by the Office of Attorney Services, it is evident that Jennifer Lee has not complied with the pro hae vice registration requirements as outlined in Gov.Bar R. XII. Therefore, it is ordered by the court that the pro hac vice admission of Jennifer Lee is revoked.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 Ohio 664, 70 N.E.3d 599, 148 Ohio St. 3d 1415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/preterm-cleveland-inc-v-kasich-ohio-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack