Preston v. Preston

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Preston v. Preston

221 So. 2d 219, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5926

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 15, 1969

DocketNo. 68-908

StatusPublished

This text of 221 So. 2d 219 (Preston v. Preston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Preston v. Preston, 221 So. 2d 219, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5926 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By this appeal, the appellant seeks review of certain post decree orders entered subsequent to a judgment of divorce. The several orders here under review be and the same are hereby affirmed.

The order as to attorney’s fees is affirmed, without prejudice to the appellant’s counsel seeking attorney fees in the trial court for any proceedings directly relating to enforcement of the original judgment of divorce. See; McNeill v. McNeill, Fla.1952, 59 So.2d 57; Blunda v. Blunda, Fla.1958, 101 So.2d 41; Metz v. Metz, Fla.App.1959, 108 So.2d 512; Teply v. Key, Fla.App.1964, 158 So.2d 549; Wilner v. Wilner, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 234; Salomon v. Salomon, Fla.App.1966, 186 So.2d 39; § 61.15, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By this appeal, the appellant seeks review of certain post decree orders entered subsequent to a judgment of divorce. The several orders here under review be and the same are hereby affirmed.

The order as to attorney’s fees is affirmed, without prejudice to the appellant’s counsel seeking attorney fees in the trial court for any proceedings directly relating to enforcement of the original judgment of divorce. See; McNeill v. McNeill, Fla.1952, 59 So.2d 57; Blunda v. Blunda, Fla.1958, 101 So.2d 41; Metz v. Metz, Fla.App.1959, 108 So.2d 512; Teply v. Key, Fla.App.1964, 158 So.2d 549; Wilner v. Wilner, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 234; Salomon v. Salomon, Fla.App.1966, 186 So.2d 39; § 61.15, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

221 So. 2d 219, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/preston-v-preston-fladistctapp-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack