Preston v. Hitchin Rail, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Preston v. Hitchin Rail, Inc.

823 N.W.2d 626, 2012 Minn. LEXIS 687, 2012 WL 6694073

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedDecember 18, 2012

DocketNo. A12-1062

StatusPublished

This text of 823 N.W.2d 626 (Preston v. Hitchin Rail, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Preston v. Hitchin Rail, Inc., 823 N.W.2d 626, 2012 Minn. LEXIS 687, 2012 WL 6694073 (Mich. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed on June 4, 2012, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that ([s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,) doing no more than establishing the law of the case)).

[627]*627BY THE COURT:

/s/_ Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI