Preston v. City of Navasota

34 Tex. 684
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1871
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 34 Tex. 684 (Preston v. City of Navasota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Preston v. City of Navasota, 34 Tex. 684 (Tex. 1871).

Opinion

Walker, J.

The proprietor of a town or city, who lays out and plats the squares, lots, streets, alleys, etc., and causes the same to be recorded in the county clerk’s office, and sells lots in accordance with such plat, dedicates the streets and alleys to the public, and cannot revoke the grant when the public acquires an easement.

The facts in this case show that Holán, the proprietor of the city of Navasota, had recorded such a plat, and though he sold the property in question to plaintiff’s intestate, with verbal representations that he had reserved the power to vacate certain streets or alleys, his vendee acquired no right by which he could oust the public easement, and his rights were subject to it.

We see no fact in this case which renders it in any way materially different from Oswald v. Grenet, 22 Texas, 94. Indeed, that case appears conclusive of the one at bar. The case has been examined and approved by the court.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Affirmed!.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1950
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Martarana
272 S.W. 299 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Sherman Slaughtering & Rendering Co. v. Texas Nursery Co.
224 S.W. 478 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1920)
Clement v. City of Paris
154 S.W. 624 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Sanborn v. City of Amarillo
93 S.W. 473 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1906)
Temple v. Sanborn
91 S.W. 1095 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1905)
Evans v. Scott
83 S.W. 874 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1904)
City of Corsicana v. Anderson
78 S.W. 261 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1903)
Bond v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.
39 S.W. 978 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1897)
City of Corsicana v. White
57 Tex. 382 (Texas Supreme Court, 1882)
Lamar County v. Clements
49 Tex. 347 (Texas Supreme Court, 1878)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 Tex. 684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/preston-v-city-of-navasota-tex-1871.