Preston Marshall and Rusk Capital Management, L.L.C. v. Maropco, Inc. and E. Pierce Marshall, Jr.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: In re Preston Marshall and Rusk Capital Management, L.L.C.
Appellate case number: 01-22-00513-CV
Trial court case number: 2015-35950
Trial court: 11th District Court of Harris County
and
Appellate case name: Preston Marshall and Rusk Capital Management, L.L.C. v. Maropco, Inc. and E. Pierce Marshall, Jr.
Appellate case number: 01-22-00573-CV
Preston Marshall and Rusk Capital Management, LLC’s motion1 for reconsideration of their emergency motion for stay is hereby denied. It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: ___________/s/ Julie Countiss__________ Acting individually
Date: August 19, 2022
1 We construe the letter filed on August 18, 2022 by Preston Marshall and Rusk Capital Management, L.LC., which “re-urge[s] that the Court issue an emergency stay of the trial court’s order for turnover of their attorney-client privileged information,” as a motion for reconsideration of the stay this Court previously denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Preston Marshall and Rusk Capital Management, L.L.C. v. Maropco, Inc. and E. Pierce Marshall, Jr. (Preston Marshall and Rusk Capital Management, L.L.C. v. Maropco, Inc. and E. Pierce Marshall, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.