Preston D. Perkins, Jr. v. Panorama Towers Condominium Unit Owners’ Association Inc., et al.

• Court: District Court, D. Nevada
• Decided: January 5, 2026
• Docket: 2:23-cv-01690
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 Preston D. Perkins, Jr., Case No. 2:23-cv-01690-CDS-DJA

5 Plaintiff Order Striking Plaintiff’s Rogue Motion to Supplement 6 v.

7 Panorama Towers Condominium Unit Owners’ Association Inc., et al., [ECF No. 97] 8

9 Defendants

10 11 This is a now-closed landlord-tenant dispute that was brought by pro se plaintiff 12 Preston D. Perkins against numerous defendants. See First am. compl., ECF No. 50. On May 7, 13 2024, I granted the defendants’ motions to dismiss and closed this case, which Perkins appealed. 14 See Order, ECF No. 92; Notice of appeal, ECF No. 93. On October 20, 2025, the Ninth Circuit 15 Court of Appeals affirmed that decision. Mem., ECF No. 96. On January 3, 2026, Perkins filed a 16 motion to supplement the record, citing Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 10(e), Federal Rule 17 of Civil Procedure 60(b)(3), and “equity jurisdiction.” Mot., ECF No. 97. None of these rules allow 18 Perkins to supplement the record in this closed case, nor is the court a repository for the 19 additional information or allegations that Perkins seeks to lodge against the defendants. 20 Accordingly, I strike the motion to supplement as rogue. See Spurlock v. F.B.I., 69 F.3d 1010, 1016 (9th 21 Cir. 1995) (explaining that the district court has inherent authority to strike improper filings “to 22 promulgate and enforce rules for the management of litigation”). 23 24 25 26 1 Conclusion 2 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion to supplement the record 3|| [ECF No. 97] is STRICKEN. 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff may not tile any new documents into this 5||closed case. /, / 6 Dated: January 5, 2026 LZ 7 f f Cristing D Ailva 8 Cretin Spates District Judge 9 / 10 ll 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26