Preston Barrett v. the State of Texas

CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)
DecidedJuly 2, 2026
Docket02-26-00188-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Preston Barrett v. the State of Texas (Preston Barrett v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Preston Barrett v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-26-00187-CR No. 02-26-00188-CR ___________________________

PRESTON BARRETT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 211th District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court Nos. F25-779-211, F25-1516-211

Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Preston Barrett attempts to appeal from the trial court’s May 7, 2026

“Order on State’s Motion to Dismiss,” which dismissed these two cases. See Love v.

State, Nos. 05-24-00258-CR, 05-24-00259-CR, 2024 WL 1268423, at *1 (Tex. App.—

Dallas Mar. 26, 2024, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (“An order

dismissing a case on the State’s motion to dismiss prosecution is not an appealable

order.”).

On May 28, 2026, we notified Appellant by letter of our concern regarding

lacking jurisdiction over these appeals because it does not appear that the trial court

has entered any appealable orders in these cases. We explained that in criminal cases,

this court’s jurisdiction is generally limited to appeals from judgments of conviction or

orders made appealable by statute. See Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 697 & n.8 (Tex.

Crim. App. 2008); McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.––Fort Worth

1996, no pet.) (per curiam). We stated that unless Appellant or any party filed a

response showing grounds for continuing the appeals by June 8, 2026, these appeals

could be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. We received no response.

Accordingly, we dismiss these appeals for want of jurisdiction.1 See Ex parte

Smith, No. 08-25-00274-CR, 2026 WL 222424, at *1 (Tex. App.—El Paso Jan. 21,

2026, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (dismissing appeal for want

Appellant’s appeals in cause numbers 02-26-00182-CR through 02-26-00186- 1

CR remain pending.

2 of jurisdiction because the trial court’s order granting the State’s motion to dismiss the

charges against appellant was not an appealable order); Love, 2024 WL 1268423, at *1

(same).

Per Curiam

Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: July 2, 2026

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Abbott v. State
271 S.W.3d 694 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2008)
McKown v. State
915 S.W.2d 160 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Preston Barrett v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/preston-barrett-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp2-2026.