Presto Plastic Products Co. v. Ball & Jewell, Inc.
This text of 281 A.D. 742 (Presto Plastic Products Co. v. Ball & Jewell, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously modified so as to grant consolidation of the Municipal Court action with the Supreme Court action upon condition that the defendant’s cause of action, as a counterclaim, be tried separately by a jury prior to the trial of the plaintiff’s equitable cause of action. Defendant Ball & Jewell, Inc., shall have the right to open and close upon the separate jury trial of its counterclaim. The equity trial may then proceed before the same justice hearing the jury issue. The order, as so modified, is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the appellant. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Callahan, Van Voorhis and Breitel, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
281 A.D. 742, 118 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/presto-plastic-products-co-v-ball-jewell-inc-nyappdiv-1953.