Presto Plastic Products Co. v. Ball & Jewell, Inc.

281 A.D. 742, 118 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3128
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 20, 1953·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously modified so as to grant consolidation of the Municipal Court action with the Supreme Court action upon condition that the defendant’s cause of action, as a counterclaim, be tried separately by a jury prior to the trial of the plaintiff’s equitable cause of action. Defendant Ball & Jewell, Inc., shall have the right to open and close upon the separate jury trial of its counterclaim. The equity trial may then proceed before the same justice hearing the jury issue. The order, as so modified, is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the appellant. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Callahan, Van Voorhis and Breitel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Presto Plastic Products Co. v. Ball & Jewell, Inc., 281 A.D. 742, 118 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3128 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

281 A.D. 742 (Presto Plastic Products Co. v. Ball & Jewell, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doran Lumber Corp. v. James Talcott, Inc.
20 A.D.2d 643 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
Gitter v. Schiff
20 Misc. 2d 610 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
123 Lafayette Avenue Corp. v. Lipstein
18 Misc. 2d 394 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Teperman v. Atcos Baths, Inc.
7 A.D.2d 858 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Walsh v. Sunny Bay Realty Co.
4 A.D.2d 699 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)