Prestige Vending, Inc. v. TRS Properties, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Prestige Vending, Inc. v. TRS Properties, Inc.

481 So. 2d 1287, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 264, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6027

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 22, 1986

DocketNos. 85-749, 85-1057

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 481 So. 2d 1287 (Prestige Vending, Inc. v. TRS Properties, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Prestige Vending, Inc. v. TRS Properties, Inc., 481 So. 2d 1287, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 264, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6027 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, the defendant in the trial court, appeals an order denying a motion to vacate default and a final judgment for damages against the appellant. We reverse because Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.500(c) specifically provides that a party may plead or otherwise defend at any time before default is entered, and the record in this case reflects that the appellant did so. See Clark v. Clark, 468 So.2d 259 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). In view of our disposition of the appeal on this point, we need not and do not address the other issues raised by the appellant.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, the defendant in the trial court, appeals an order denying a motion to vacate default and a final judgment for damages against the appellant. We reverse because Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.500(c) specifically provides that a party may plead or otherwise defend at any time before default is entered, and the record in this case reflects that the appellant did so. See Clark v. Clark, 468 So.2d 259 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). In view of our disposition of the appeal on this point, we need not and do not address the other issues raised by the appellant.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

481 So. 2d 1287, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 264, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prestige-vending-inc-v-trs-properties-inc-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack