Prestige v. Prestige

25 Tex. 585
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 25 Tex. 585 (Prestige v. Prestige) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prestige v. Prestige, 25 Tex. 585 (Tex. 1860).

Opinion

Roberts, J.

There is no appeal bond and appellee, on this account, moves to dismiss the appeal. In the record is found an affidavit of the appellant, that she is too poor to give an appeal bond. The statute under which this affidavit is made applies to proceedings in the District Court, and not in the Supreme Court. (O. & W. Dig., Art. 521.) The statutes regulating appeals and [586]*586writs of error to the Supreme Court, require a bond for costs at least, in all cases without any exception. (O. & W. Dig., Arts. 551, 557.) This has been so held by this court previously. (A case from San Augustine District Court at Tyler, ’58 or ’59. Holloway v.-.) -Appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moran Oil & Gas Co. v. Anderson
223 S.W. 1031 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1920)
Crenshaw v. Hempel
130 S.W. 731 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1910)
Durham v. Betterton
14 S.W. 1060 (Texas Supreme Court, 1891)
Halloran v. T. & N. O. R. R.
40 Tex. 465 (Texas Supreme Court, 1874)
Rodgers v. Alexander
35 Tex. 116 (Texas Supreme Court, 1872)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Tex. 585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prestige-v-prestige-tex-1860.