Prestige v. Prestige

25 Tex. 585
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1860·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Roberts, J.

There is no appeal bond and appellee, on this account, moves to dismiss the appeal. In the record is found an affidavit of the appellant, that she is too poor to give an appeal bond. The statute under which this affidavit is made applies to proceedings in the District Court, and not in the Supreme Court. (O. & W. Dig., Art. 521.) The statutes regulating appeals and [586]*586writs of error to the Supreme Court, require a bond for costs at least, in all cases without any exception. (O. & W. Dig., Arts. 551, 557.) This has been so held by this court previously. (A case from San Augustine District Court at Tyler, ’58 or ’59. Holloway v.-.) -Appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prestige v. Prestige, 25 Tex. 585 (Tex. 1860).

25 Tex. 585 (Prestige v. Prestige) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moran Oil & Gas Co. v. Anderson
223 S.W. 1031 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1920)
Crenshaw v. Hempel
130 S.W. 731 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1910)
Durham v. Betterton
14 S.W. 1060 (Texas Supreme Court, 1891)
Halloran v. T. & N. O. R. R.
40 Tex. 465 (Texas Supreme Court, 1874)
Rodgers v. Alexander
35 Tex. 116 (Texas Supreme Court, 1872)