Prestige Restaurants and Entertainment, Inc. v. Bayside Seafood Restaurant, Inc.
This text of 417 F. App'x 892 (Prestige Restaurants and Entertainment, Inc. v. Bayside Seafood Restaurant, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Prestige Restaurants and Entertainment, Inc. appeals the dismissal of its 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against defendants Blue Green Bay Corporation (“BGB”), Armando Lacasa and Carlos Lacasa, the City of Miami, Miami Police Sergeant Martha Carbana, and Miami Police Commander Lorenzo Whitehead alleging that the defendants unreasonable seized its property, and the dismissal of its § 1981 and § 1982 claims against BGB and the Lacasas alleging that they unlawfully discriminated against Prestige on the basis of the race of its clientele.
*893 We review de novo the district court’s grant of the defendants’ motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim, accepting the allegations in the complaint as true and construing them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Mills v. Foremost Ins. Co., 511 F.3d 1300, 1303 (11th Cir.2008). After careful review of the record and the parties’ briefs, and having had the benefit of oral argument, we find no reversible error in the district court’s order dismissing the Amended Complaint.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
417 F. App'x 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prestige-restaurants-and-entertainment-inc-v-bayside-seafood-restaurant-ca11-2011.