Prestige Printing AH Corp. v. State, Department of Transportation

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Prestige Printing AH Corp. v. State, Department of Transportation

668 So. 2d 1052, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1561, 1996 WL 72332

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 21, 1996

DocketNo. 95-961

StatusPublished

This text of 668 So. 2d 1052 (Prestige Printing AH Corp. v. State, Department of Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Prestige Printing AH Corp. v. State, Department of Transportation, 668 So. 2d 1052, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1561, 1996 WL 72332 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is no merit either in appellant’s challenge to the constitutionality of section 287.042(2)(c), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994), see Carter v. Sparkman, 335 So.2d 802 (Fla.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1041, 97 S.Ct. 740, 50 L.Ed.2d 753 (1977); Griffith v. Vecchiarelli, 97 So.2d 691 (Fla.1957), or its com[1053]*1053plaints about the manner in which it was applied by the D.O.T. Cf. ABI Walton Ins. Co. v. State Dep’t of Management Servs., 641 So.2d 967 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (reversal required only because bidder not given reasonable opportunity to post § 287.042(2)(c) bond in appropriate amount).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

There is no merit either in appellant’s challenge to the constitutionality of section 287.042(2)(c), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994), see Carter v. Sparkman, 335 So.2d 802 (Fla.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1041, 97 S.Ct. 740, 50 L.Ed.2d 753 (1977); Griffith v. Vecchiarelli, 97 So.2d 691 (Fla.1957), or its com[1053]*1053plaints about the manner in which it was applied by the D.O.T. Cf. ABI Walton Ins. Co. v. State Dep’t of Management Servs., 641 So.2d 967 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (reversal required only because bidder not given reasonable opportunity to post § 287.042(2)(c) bond in appropriate amount).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

668 So. 2d 1052, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1561, 1996 WL 72332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prestige-printing-ah-corp-v-state-department-of-transportation-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack