Prestige Printing AH Corp. v. State, Department of Transportation

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Prestige Printing AH Corp. v. State, Department of Transportation

668 So. 2d 1052, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1561, 1996 WL 72332

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 21, 1996·No. No. 95-961·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is no merit either in appellant’s challenge to the constitutionality of section 287.042(2)(c), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994), see Carter v. Sparkman, 335 So.2d 802 (Fla.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1041, 97 S.Ct. 740, 50 L.Ed.2d 753 (1977); Griffith v. Vecchiarelli, 97 So.2d 691 (Fla.1957), or its com[1053] plaints about the manner in which it was applied by the D.O.T. Cf. ABI Walton Ins. Co. v. State Dep’t of Management Servs., 641 So.2d 967 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (reversal required only because bidder not given reasonable opportunity to post § 287.042(2)(c) bond in appropriate amount).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

There is no merit either in appellant’s challenge to the constitutionality of section 287.042(2)(c), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994), see Carter v. Sparkman, 335 So.2d 802 (Fla.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1041, 97 S.Ct. 740, 50 L.Ed.2d 753 (1977); Griffith v. Vecchiarelli, 97 So.2d 691 (Fla.1957), or its com[1053] plaints about the manner in which it was applied by the D.O.T. Cf. ABI Walton Ins. Co. v. State Dep’t of Management Servs., 641 So.2d 967 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (reversal required only because bidder not given reasonable opportunity to post § 287.042(2)(c) bond in appropriate amount).

Affirmed.

Prestige Printing AH Corp. v. State, Department of Transportation, 668 So. 2d 1052, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1561, 1996 WL 72332 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

668 So. 2d 1052 (Prestige Printing AH Corp. v. State, Department of Transportation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related