Pressner v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Pressner v. United States

34 Cust. Ct. 406

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pressner v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 32 Cust. Ct. 468 →

United States Customs Court·Decided June 16, 1955·No. No. 59142; protest 211332-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise identified on invoice 4 as item Nos. 5056, 5061, and 5663, contained in cases marked:

M P 58063/4, 58068 and 58070 & Co.

are adult trick articles, consisting of rubber lapel pin-ons with a rubber tube and bulb attached; that said articles are composed wholly or in chief value of rubber; and that they are not toys chiefly used for the amusement of children. On the agreed facts, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise identified on invoice 4 as item Nos. 5056, 5061, and 5663, contained in cases marked:

M P 58063/4, 58068 and 58070 & Co.

are adult trick articles, consisting of rubber lapel pin-ons with a rubber tube and bulb attached; that said articles are composed wholly or in chief value of rubber; and that they are not toys chiefly used for the amusement of children. On the agreed facts, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Pressner v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 406 (cusc 1955).

Pincite

34 Cust. Ct. 406 (Pressner v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.