Pressley v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

63 F. App'x 151
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 20, 2003
DocketNo. 02-2276
StatusPublished

This text of 63 F. App'x 151 (Pressley v. South Carolina Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pressley v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, 63 F. App'x 151 (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Thomas M. Pressley appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment in favor of his former employer, the South Carolina Department of Corrections, on his claims arising under Title YII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp.2002), and the Family Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, [152]*152we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Pressley v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corrections, No. CA-00-3965-6-24-BG (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 2601-2654
29 U.S.C. § 2601-2654
Definitions
42 U.S.C. § 2000e
§ 2601
29 U.S.C. § 2601

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 F. App'x 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pressley-v-south-carolina-department-of-corrections-ca4-2003.