Press v. Ridgway Refrigerator Manufacturing Co.

37 Ill. App. 269, 1889 Ill. App. LEXIS 692
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedOctober 23, 1890
StatusPublished

This text of 37 Ill. App. 269 (Press v. Ridgway Refrigerator Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Press v. Ridgway Refrigerator Manufacturing Co., 37 Ill. App. 269, 1889 Ill. App. LEXIS 692 (Ill. Ct. App. 1890).

Opinion

Gary, J.

The plaintiff in error, defendant below, was summoned more than ten days before the October term, 1888, of the County Court. Ho declaration was filed until during the Hovember term. At the February term, 1889, the plaintiff in error not having appeared in the suit, judgment by default was entered against him.

This was error. Ho declaration having been filed ten days before the Hovember term, the right to pursue the defendant in that' action was gone, unless the defendant should waive the objection. Sec. 17, Practice Act; Pratt v. Grimes, 35 Ill. 164; Moody v. Thomas, 79 Ill. 274.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pratt v. Grimes
35 Ill. 164 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1864)
Moody v. Thomas
79 Ill. 274 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1875)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 Ill. App. 269, 1889 Ill. App. LEXIS 692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/press-v-ridgway-refrigerator-manufacturing-co-illappct-1890.