Press v. New York

242 U.S. 618, 37 S. Ct. 214, 61 L. Ed. 530, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1416
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 18, 1916·No. No. 120·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Haseltine v. Central Bank of Springfield, 183 U. S. 130; Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173; Missouri & Kansas Interurban Ry. Co. v. Olathe, 222 U. S. 185; Louisiana Navigation Company v. Oyster Commission of Louisiana, 226 U. S. 99; Thompson v. St. Louis, 241 U. S. 637. Mr. Alfred E. Ommen for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Bobert S. Johnstone and Mr. Leonard J. Oberman for the defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Press v. New York, 242 U.S. 618, 37 S. Ct. 214, 61 L. Ed. 530, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1416 (1916).

242 U.S. 618 (Press v. New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Hostetter
45 Misc. 2d 956 (New York Supreme Court, 1965)