Press Co. v. J. J. Little & Ives Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Press Co. v. J. J. Little & Ives Co.

256 A.D. 878, 9 N.Y.S.2d 221, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5216

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 25, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D. 878 (Press Co. v. J. J. Little & Ives Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Press Co. v. J. J. Little & Ives Co., 256 A.D. 878, 9 N.Y.S.2d 221, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5216 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

— Defendant has appealed from an order of the Albany Special Term of the Supreme Court, denying its motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The action is to recover a credit for the return of certain books which plaintiff had purchased from defendant upon a consignment basis. The complaint alleged an offer and acceptance. The defendant delivered the books. The plaintiff paid therefor and later offered to return those which had been unsold and which defendant refused to accept. The complaint states a good cause of action. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Defendant has appealed from an order of the Albany Special Term of the Supreme Court, denying its motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The action is to recover a credit for the return of certain books which plaintiff had purchased from defendant upon a consignment basis. The complaint alleged an offer and acceptance. The defendant delivered the books. The plaintiff paid therefor and later offered to return those which had been unsold and which defendant refused to accept. The complaint states a good cause of action. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D. 878, 9 N.Y.S.2d 221, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/press-co-v-j-j-little-ives-co-nyappdiv-1939.