Presley v. Paget

2011 UT App 45, 248 P.3d 1038, 675 Utah Adv. Rep. 26, 2011 Utah App. LEXIS 43, 2011 WL 484308
CourtCourt of Appeals of Utah
DecidedFebruary 10, 2011
Docket20101029-CA
StatusPublished

This text of 2011 UT App 45 (Presley v. Paget) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Presley v. Paget, 2011 UT App 45, 248 P.3d 1038, 675 Utah Adv. Rep. 26, 2011 Utah App. LEXIS 43, 2011 WL 484308 (Utah Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

248 P.3d 1038 (2011)
2011 UT App 45

Jason Aron PRESLEY, Petitioner and Appellant,
v.
Debra PAGET and Elvis Presley, Respondents and Appellee.

No. 20101029-CA.

Court of Appeals of Utah.

February 10, 2011.

*1039 Jason Aron Presley, Salt Lake City, Appellant Pro Se.

Bart J. Johnsen, Salt Lake City, for Appellee.

Before Judges McHUGH, ORME, and VOROS.

DECISION

PER CURIAM:

¶ 1 Jason Aron Presley appeals the district court's order entered on November 1, 2010. This matter is before the court on a sua sponte motion for summary disposition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

¶ 2 Rule 4 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure requires that a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days of the entry of the final order or judgment appealed. See Utah R.App. P. 4(a). If a notice of appeal is not timely filed, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeal. See Serrato v. Utah Transit Auth., 2000 UT App 299, ¶ 7, 13 P.3d 616. If this court lacks jurisdiction over an appeal, we are required to dismiss the appeal. See Varian-Eimac, Inc. v. Lamoreaux, 767 P.2d 569, 570 (Utah Ct.App.1989).

¶ 3 On November 1, 2010, the district court entered a final order dismissing the underlying matter. On December 3, 2010, Presley filed his notice of appeal in the district court. Because the notice of appeal was not timely filed, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeal. See Serrato, 2000 UT App 299, ¶ 7, 13 P.3d 616. Thus, we are required to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Varian-Eimac, Inc., 767 P.2d at 570.

¶ 4 Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Varian-Eimac, Inc. v. Lamoreaux
767 P.2d 569 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 1989)
Serrato v. Utah Transit Authority
2000 UT App 299 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2011 UT App 45, 248 P.3d 1038, 675 Utah Adv. Rep. 26, 2011 Utah App. LEXIS 43, 2011 WL 484308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/presley-v-paget-utahctapp-2011.