Presley v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Presley v. County of Nassau

188 A.D.2d 594, 591 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14494

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 188 A.D.2d 594 (Presley v. County of Nassau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Presley v. County of Nassau, 188 A.D.2d 594, 591 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14494 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover unclaimed ticket proceeds in the possession of the defendant Nassau Veterans’ Memorial Coliseum, the [595]*595plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Wager, J.), entered October 25, 1990, which granted the motion of the defendant State of New York for summary judgment and directed that all but $5,000 of the proceeds be paid to the State’s abandoned property fund.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs payable to the respondent by the appellants.

Fifteen years after Elvis Presley’s death resulted in the cancellation of a concert to be held at the Nassau Veterans’ Memorial Coliseum, approximately $85,930 in ticket proceeds remain unclaimed. The plaintiffs have claimed this sum, and the State of New York has claimed the proceeds as abandoned property.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the ticket proceeds represent money paid "for services not rendered * * * owing in this state”, and are thus to be paid into the State’s abandoned property fund (see, Abandoned Property Law § 1315 [1]). We also agree that the memorabilia value of the tickets, even if proven, would not affect the rights of the holders to a refund or the rights of the State under the Abandoned Property Law, whereby the State acts as custodian of property for the rightful owner (see, Presley v City of Memphis, 769 SW2d 221 [Tenn]; see generally, Matter of New York Univ. [Moore], 271 App Div 131, affd 296 NY 913).

While the State did not originally appear in this action, there is no limitation period for its claims under the Abandoned Property Law (see, Abandoned Property Law § 1400), and the court properly exercised its power to add the State as a party in the interest of judicial economy (see, CPLR 1003). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Miller, JJ., concur. [See, 148 Misc 2d 125.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover unclaimed ticket proceeds in the possession of the defendant Nassau Veterans’ Memorial Coliseum, the [595]*595plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Wager, J.), entered October 25, 1990, which granted the motion of the defendant State of New York for summary judgment and directed that all but $5,000 of the proceeds be paid to the State’s abandoned property fund.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs payable to the respondent by the appellants.

Fifteen years after Elvis Presley’s death resulted in the cancellation of a concert to be held at the Nassau Veterans’ Memorial Coliseum, approximately $85,930 in ticket proceeds remain unclaimed. The plaintiffs have claimed this sum, and the State of New York has claimed the proceeds as abandoned property.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the ticket proceeds represent money paid "for services not rendered * * * owing in this state”, and are thus to be paid into the State’s abandoned property fund (see, Abandoned Property Law § 1315 [1]). We also agree that the memorabilia value of the tickets, even if proven, would not affect the rights of the holders to a refund or the rights of the State under the Abandoned Property Law, whereby the State acts as custodian of property for the rightful owner (see, Presley v City of Memphis, 769 SW2d 221 [Tenn]; see generally, Matter of New York Univ. [Moore], 271 App Div 131, affd 296 NY 913).

While the State did not originally appear in this action, there is no limitation period for its claims under the Abandoned Property Law (see, Abandoned Property Law § 1400), and the court properly exercised its power to add the State as a party in the interest of judicial economy (see, CPLR 1003). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Miller, JJ., concur. [See, 148 Misc 2d 125.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 A.D.2d 594, 591 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/presley-v-county-of-nassau-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack