Presidential Vill., LLC v. Perkins
This text of 174 A.3d 193 (Presidential Vill., LLC v. Perkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court,
"1. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court's holding that a federal pretermination notice for nonpayment of rent must be limited to rent charges that are a permissible basis for such an eviction under Connecticut summary process law?
"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that state law is not relevant in determining whether the information provided in a federal pretermination notice is so misleading as to render it jurisdictionally defective?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
174 A.3d 193, 327 Conn. 974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/presidential-vill-llc-v-perkins-conn-2017.