Presidential Vill., LLC v. Perkins

174 A.3d 193, 327 Conn. 974
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 29, 2017·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 176 Conn. App. 493, 170 A.3d 701 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court's holding that a federal pretermination notice for nonpayment of rent must be limited to rent charges that are a permissible basis for such an eviction under Connecticut summary process law?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that state law is not relevant in determining whether the information provided in a federal pretermination notice is so misleading as to render it jurisdictionally defective?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Presidential Vill., LLC v. Perkins, 174 A.3d 193, 327 Conn. 974 (Colo. 2017).

174 A.3d 193 (Presidential Vill., LLC v. Perkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Presidential Village, LLC v. Perkins
209 A.3d 616 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2019)