President of the Union Bank v. Clossey

10 Johns. 271
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1813
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 10 Johns. 271 (President of the Union Bank v. Clossey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
President of the Union Bank v. Clossey, 10 Johns. 271 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1813).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Without noticing the subsequent pleadings, it is sufficient to observe that the replication is bad in substance; for it assigns no breach of trust or want of fidelity in the clerk. The bond was, that he should well and■ faithfully perform his duties as first teller; and this evidently applied to his honesty, and not to his ability in his trust. A mere mistake in overpayment of a check can never be alleged as a breach of trust, for the.mistake may happen to a teller of the purest morals and the best capacity for business.

Judgment for the defendant, with leave, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Michener v. Egbert
24 N.E. 256 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1890)
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. v. Bartlett
20 Ill. App. 96 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1886)
State v. Chadwick
10 Or. 465 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1882)
President of the State Bank v. Locke
15 N.C. 529 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1834)
Bank of United States v. Brent
2 D.C. 696 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1826)
Bank of the United States v. Brent
2 F. Cas. 688 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1826)
State Bank v. Chetwood
8 N.J.L. 1 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1824)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Johns. 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/president-of-the-union-bank-v-clossey-nysupct-1813.