President of the Ontario Bank v. Lansing

2 Wend. 260
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 15, 1829·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

By the Court, Marcy, J.

The peculiar circumstances of this case might lead to difficulties and embarrassments. The purchaser, who is the assignee of the judgment, intimating his intention to have bid for the property sold a sufficient amount to pay and satisfy his judgment, in case a redemption was sought by the defendant or a junior judgment creditor ; and having, in fact, bid for the same a sum sufficiently great to effect that object, is entitled to have bis rights placed beyond the reach of controversy. The embarrassments which exist in the case grow out of the agreement with the defendant respecting the application of the proceeds of the sale to the satisfaction of the mortgage. We perceive no objections to granting the motion, which is accordingly granted, and a new sale ordered at the expense of the assignee of the judg [262] ment, he stipulating at a future sale to bid at least the sum of $218 29, the sum heretofore bid over and above the amount of the mortgage.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

President of the Ontario Bank v. Lansing, 2 Wend. 260 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1829).

2 Wend. 260 (President of the Ontario Bank v. Lansing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hughes v. Duncan
60 Tex. 72 (Texas Supreme Court, 1883)
Johnson v. Crawl
55 Tex. 571 (Texas Supreme Court, 1881)
Case v. Colter
66 Ind. 336 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1879)
Dewey v. Linscott
20 Kan. 684 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1878)
Hopton v. Swan
50 Miss. 545 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1874)
Parks v. Davis
16 Iowa 20 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1864)
Dwight's Case
15 Abb. Pr. 259 (New York Supreme Court, 1862)
Ritter v. Henshaw
7 Iowa 97 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1858)
Tillman v. Jackson
1 Minn. 183 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1854)
Lee v. Davis
16 Ala. 516 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1849)
Warner v. Helm
6 Ill. 220 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1844)
Mulks v. Allen
12 Wend. 253 (New York Supreme Court, 1834)