President of the Ohio & Mississippi Railroad v. Huckleberry

17 Ind. 128, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 320
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 29, 1861
StatusPublished

This text of 17 Ind. 128 (President of the Ohio & Mississippi Railroad v. Huckleberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
President of the Ohio & Mississippi Railroad v. Huckleberry, 17 Ind. 128, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 320 (Ind. 1861).

Opinion

Per Curiam

sujp by Huckleberry against the company, [129]*129for killing stock upon the road, where it was not fenced. Issue; trial by the Court;-finding and judgment for the plaintiff.

Theodore Gaalay and Lucius G. Bingham., for the appellants. James Id. Vdwter^ for the appellee.

The only question raised is, as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding. Having examined the evidence, W'e are of opinion that it tends to make out every material fact necessary to the plaintiff’s recovery.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 Ind. 128, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/president-of-the-ohio-mississippi-railroad-v-huckleberry-ind-1861.