President of the Highland Turnpike Co. v. M'Kean

New York Supreme Court

President of the Highland Turnpike Co. v. M'Kean

10 Johns. 154

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedMay 15, 1813

StatusPublished

Cited by14 cases

This text of 10 Johns. 154 (President of the Highland Turnpike Co. v. M'Kean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

President of the Highland Turnpike Co. v. M'Kean, 10 Johns. 154 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1813).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for a new trial and a motion in arrest of judgment were argued together, but as the court are in [158]*158favour of the flrst motion, it is unnecessary, at present, to express an opinion upon the second.

The plaintiffs were bound to prove, upon the trial, the aver~ ments in their declaration, a~nd if the book of minutes which was introduced had been legally authenticated, it would have contained the requisite proof of those averments. The general rule is, (and it is a rule of evidence essential' to public convenience,) that corporation books are evidence of the proceedings of the corporation, but then it must appear that they are the corporation books, and that they have been kept as such, and the entries made by the proper- officer,' or some other person in his necessary absence. (King v. Mothersell, 1 Stra. 93. 12 Vin. tit. Ev. 90. pl. 16. 2 Camp. N. P. 101.) In this case there was no legal evidence of the authenticity of the book, as being the minutes of the company, or that it had been regularly kept as such, by the proper officer. The whole evidence consisted of the fact that the book was in the handwriting of one Howland, who appeared, from the entries in the book (but in no other way) to have been secretary to the board. Unless, then, the book be considered as proving itself, there was no proof of its being the book it purported to be.

The motion for a new trial is accordingly granted, with costs to abide the event of the suit.

New trial granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion for a new trial and a motion in arrest of judgment were argued together, but as the court are in [158]*158favour of the flrst motion, it is unnecessary, at present, to express an opinion upon the second.

The plaintiffs were bound to prove, upon the trial, the aver~ ments in their declaration, a~nd if the book of minutes which was introduced had been legally authenticated, it would have contained the requisite proof of those averments. The general rule is, (and it is a rule of evidence essential' to public convenience,) that corporation books are evidence of the proceedings of the corporation, but then it must appear that they are the corporation books, and that they have been kept as such, and the entries made by the proper- officer,' or some other person in his necessary absence. (King v. Mothersell, 1 Stra. 93. 12 Vin. tit. Ev. 90. pl. 16. 2 Camp. N. P. 101.) In this case there was no legal evidence of the authenticity of the book, as being the minutes of the company, or that it had been regularly kept as such, by the proper officer. The whole evidence consisted of the fact that the book was in the handwriting of one Howland, who appeared, from the entries in the book (but in no other way) to have been secretary to the board. Unless, then, the book be considered as proving itself, there was no proof of its being the book it purported to be.

The motion for a new trial is accordingly granted, with costs to abide the event of the suit.

New trial granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Johns. 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/president-of-the-highland-turnpike-co-v-mkean-nysupct-1813.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack