President of the Hanover Saving Fund Society v. Suter
1 Md. 502
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
We do not concur with the county court in the instruction which it gave. The only plea was that of non-assumpsit, and under such a plea, advantage could not be taken of the [504] misnomer, for such we consider the character of the point presented by the second prayer of the defendant, which the county court gave. The case is identically the same in principle, as that of Bank of Metropolis vs. Orme, 3 Gill, 443.
Judgment reversed and procedendo awarded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
President of the Hanover Saving Fund Society v. Suter, 1 Md. 502 (Md. 1851).
1 Md. 502 (President of the Hanover Saving Fund Society v. Suter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bank of the Metropolis v. Orme
3 Gill 443 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1845)