President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co. v. Elting
3 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 29, 1843 N.Y. LEXIS 363
Opinion
Decided that the want of a schedule of the property assign-L 4 ° ed by a debtor is only a badge of fraud, and is not conclusive evidence of an intent to defraud the creditors of the assignor.
Application for an injunction and to extend the receivership to the assigned properly denied, with $15 costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co. v. Elting, 3 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 29, 1843 N.Y. LEXIS 363 (N.Y. 1843).
3 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 29 (President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co. v. Elting) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.