President of the Chemung Canal Bank v. Board of Supervisors

1 How. Pr. 162
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1845
StatusPublished

This text of 1 How. Pr. 162 (President of the Chemung Canal Bank v. Board of Supervisors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
President of the Chemung Canal Bank v. Board of Supervisors, 1 How. Pr. 162 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).

Opinion

Bronson, Chief Justice.

Denied the motion upon the defect in defendants’ affidavit; which stated that he had a good and substantial defence upon the merits to the whole or some part of plaintiffs’ demand; it did not come within the rule.

Decision.—Motion denied with costs, without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/president-of-the-chemung-canal-bank-v-board-of-supervisors-nysupct-1845.