President of the Bank of Pennsylvania v. Lassel

2 Yeates 387
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 15, 1798
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Yeates 387 (President of the Bank of Pennsylvania v. Lassel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
President of the Bank of Pennsylvania v. Lassel, 2 Yeates 387 (Pa. 1798).

Opinion

Per M’Kean, C. J. and Yeates, J.

The general rule here, as in England, is never to make a bail bond stand as a security, where the plaintiff can be put in as good a condition, as if he had never been delayed. Cowp. 71. The raging of the yellow fever at the last term, induced the court to direct, that on judgments then entered, the eessets should be prolonged from sixty days to the first day of the present term. Consequently no execution could have issued earlier than this term, if the bail had been duly entered. The defendant possessed no lands which might have been bound by a judgment at the last September term. And the counsel’s argument as to the issuing of the ca. sa. returnable during the term removes all difficulty.

Motion granted.

Shippen and Smith Justices refused to take any part in the decision, being stockholders of the bank of Pennsylvania.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

M'Farland v. Holmes
5 Serg. & Rawle 50 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1819)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Yeates 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/president-of-the-bank-of-pennsylvania-v-lassel-pa-1798.