President of Terre Haute & Richmond Railroad v. Smith

19 Ind. 42
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1862·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Suit by Smith against The Terre Haute and Richmond Railroad Company, to recover for stock killed by tbe machinery of the road, in 1858. The suit was commenced in tbe Common Pleas, and the complaint did not allege negligence, but simply that tbe road was not fenced.

A demurrer to tbe answer reached back to tbe complaint.

Tbe cases of The Jeffersonville, etc., v. Martin, 10 Ind. 416; The Indianapolis, etc., v. Taffe, 11 Id. 458; and Indianapolis, etc., v. Kercheval, 16 Id. 84, are decisive that tbe action can not be maintained.

Tbe objections that there was a want of jurisdiction, and of a cause of action, may be raised, upon appeal.

Tbe judgment is reversed, with costs; cause remanded to be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

President of Terre Haute & Richmond Railroad v. Smith, 19 Ind. 42 (Ind. 1862).

19 Ind. 42 (President of Terre Haute & Richmond Railroad v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Phillips v. Klepfer
27 N.E.2d 340 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1940)
Pennsylvania Co. v. Marion
3 N.E. 874 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1885)
Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis Railroad v. Ross
37 Ind. 545 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1871)
Indianapolis, Pittsburgh & Cleveland Railroad v. Brucey
21 Ind. 215 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1863)