President of Terre Haute & Richmond Railroad v. Smith
This text of 19 Ind. 42 (President of Terre Haute & Richmond Railroad v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Suit by Smith against The Terre Haute and Richmond Railroad Company, to recover for stock killed by tbe machinery of the road, in 1858. The suit was commenced in tbe Common Pleas, and the complaint did not allege negligence, but simply that tbe road was not fenced.
A demurrer to tbe answer reached back to tbe complaint.
Tbe cases of The Jeffersonville, etc., v. Martin, 10 Ind. 416; The Indianapolis, etc., v. Taffe, 11 Id. 458; and Indianapolis, etc., v. Kercheval, 16 Id. 84, are decisive that tbe action can not be maintained.
Tbe objections that there was a want of jurisdiction, and of a cause of action, may be raised, upon appeal.
Tbe judgment is reversed, with costs; cause remanded to be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 Ind. 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/president-of-terre-haute-richmond-railroad-v-smith-ind-1862.