President of Hartford Bank v. Hart

3 Day 491
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided February 15, 1807·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

By thk Court.

It is clear, that the doings of a corporation can be known only by its corporate acts, The confessions of individual members cannot be received. Though the directors have certain powers, resulting from their act of incorporation, and are, for certain purposes, agents; and though their acts, when in strict relation to their agency, are binding en the corporation; yet, as to the matters attempted to be proved, it does not appear that they were agents. The evidence is, therefore, inadmissible.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

President of Hartford Bank v. Hart, 3 Day 491 (Colo. Ct. App. 1807).

3 Day 491 (President of Hartford Bank v. Hart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lauderdale v. State
343 S.W.2d 422 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1961)
County of Mono v. Flanigan
62 P. 293 (California Supreme Court, 1900)
Loomis, Campbell & Co. v. Eagle Bank
1 Disney (Ohio) 285 (Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati, 1857)
National Bank v. Norton
1 Hill & Den. 572 (New York Supreme Court, 1841)
Polleys v. Ocean Insurance
14 Me. 141 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1837)