President of Farmers' Bank v. Horsey

1 Del. 514
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedJuly 1, 1835
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Del. 514 (President of Farmers' Bank v. Horsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
President of Farmers' Bank v. Horsey, 1 Del. 514 (Del. Ct. App. 1835).

Opinion

The principal question was decided by this court in the case of McDowell vs. the Bank of Wilmington and Brandywine (ante 27) when it was held that the discharge of an indorser by the acts of the holder of a note could not be set up as a defence at law after judgment. The matter relied upon in this case as a discharge of the surety could not avail him in this court even before judgment, for he stands as a principal in the bond and must be regarded as such here. In the present state of the pleadings even this question is out of the way, for the bond is not set out in the plea, and does not appear any where on the record; nor was oyer of it demandable after judgment.

Demurrer allowed.

Judgment for plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Del. 514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/president-of-farmers-bank-v-horsey-delsuperct-1835.