President & Directors of the Manhattan Co. v. Rom

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

President & Directors of the Manhattan Co. v. Rom

263 A.D. 821, 32 N.Y.S.2d 138, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5139

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 1, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 821 (President & Directors of the Manhattan Co. v. Rom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

President & Directors of the Manhattan Co. v. Rom, 263 A.D. 821, 32 N.Y.S.2d 138, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5139 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting an injunction pendente lite restraining appellants from disposing of the balance of a bank account, in so far as appealed from, modified on the law by requiring that, pursuant to sections 819 and 893 of the Civil Practice Act, plaintiff furnish an undertaking executed by it, or by a surety company at the election of plaintiff, in the sum of $250, and, as so modified, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellants. The undertaking is to be furnished within ten days after service of the order entered hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting an injunction pendente lite restraining appellants from disposing of the balance of a bank account, in so far as appealed from, modified on the law by requiring that, pursuant to sections 819 and 893 of the Civil Practice Act, plaintiff furnish an undertaking executed by it, or by a surety company at the election of plaintiff, in the sum of $250, and, as so modified, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellants. The undertaking is to be furnished within ten days after service of the order entered hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 821, 32 N.Y.S.2d 138, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/president-directors-of-the-manhattan-co-v-rom-nyappdiv-1941.